Rashad Khalifa cannot be falsified as a messenger

The purpose of this blog is to demonstrate that the efforts of those who attempt to falsify Rashad as a messenger by citing alleged mistakes he made are in vain.

Most of what they do is make assumptions as to what a messenger can and can’t do, as to what qualifies or disqualifies a messenger, and then force those assumptions on you to reach their conclusions, and worst of all these assumptions are not in the Quran and they are not using the Quran as the criterion/”furqan” to make these assessments.

What is apparent, is even if you give them the benefit of the doubt, even if we grant these assumptions (as to what the messenger can and cannot do) as being true–by Rashad’s own distinction, there is a difference between a messenger acting as a human and acting as a messenger. And this is the case with Muhammad as well, as Rashad explains in the heading of 33:36-37 “Muhammad the man disobeys Muhammad the messenger”–even Muhammad the human has to obey Muhammad the messenger. There is “Rashad the messenger” who is infallible and only explains revelations from God vs. “Rashad the human” who is fallible and is not relaying revelations from God, but his human opinion.

What’s worse for the nonbeliever, is even if they don’t accept this distinction between “Rashad the human vs. Rashad the messenger”, the fact of the matter is: if it is even possible this is the case and possible that Rashad the messenger made this distinction, then Rashad is still unfalsifiable as a messenger.

Thus God has made Rashad unfalsifiable as a messenger. God has provided this unfalsifiability of his messenger by having Rashad himself teach this important concept from the Quran. He blessed the believers with this unfalsifiability. And this only serves to remove any legitimate excuse for the nonbeliever who witnessed the math miracle when they reject Rashad. The math miracle establishes Rashad Khalifa as a messenger–what now is your excuse in rejecting him, especially since God has made his messenger unfalsifiable (even if we grant your mistaken assumptions)?

Is unfalsifiabiliy a problem?

If he couldn’t be verified as a messenger, that would be problematic as there is no way for anyone to know whether he is a messenger or not. But as it turns out he can.

Let me illustrate why unfalsifiability is not a problem so long as it is verifiable:

The real problem is when something is unverifiable.
Suppose I tell you there is an invisible gargoyle named “Wazuzu” in my room that only I can see, but every-time you come into my room, he disappears. The issue with this is it is unfalsifiable and unverifiable-it cannot be proven true or false. How are you supposed to believe it exists? But, suppose I tell you that I will empty my entire room, and I will have you stand outside the door, and I will take a brand new unaltered inspected Polaroid camera (non-digital camera that prints pictures on the spot) and I take a picture of Wazuzu when you are not in the room and immediately show it to you as the camera prints it out. Now you can see Wazuzu in the picture. Now Wazuzu is verifiable, but still unfalsifiable. You can verify Wazuzu exists now, even though you cannot falsify him.

Disclaimer: These blogs are not meant to be authoritative for Submission, but instead, informal documentation of my evolving thoughts. I do not claim ‘truth’ to anything I say or write, even if I currently feel like it is likely true based on my current reasoning and knowledge–anything and everything I say is subject to revision or complete abandonment of the theories/concepts/thoughts discussed in any of these blogs. See the about this blog section. Join our discord server, where you can chat with us or ask any questions (there is frequent activity in the voice channels): Https://Discord.gg/Submission

Leave a comment